The Ninth Circuit later affirmed the class certification decision in 2019, agreeing that BIPA protects concrete privacy interests and violations of the procedures in BIPA actually harm those privacy interests. Subsequently, Judge Donato denied competing motions for summary judgment because of unresolved factual disputes over whether Facebook's technology actually collects and stores scans of the "face geometry" of users. Class members could rely on common proof to show that they were harmed by Facebook's collection of their biometric information because pleading of some additional "actual injury" other than violation of the statute was unnecessary. In 2018, Judge Donato denied Facebook's motion to dismiss and certified the class, finding that BIPA vested in Illinois residents the right to control their biometric information by requiring notice before collection and the ability to withhold consent, which codified a right of privacy in personal biometric information.Ĭonsequently, violation of the procedural rights granted by BIPA necessarily amounts to a concrete injury because it infringes on the privacy rights protected by the statute, and plaintiffs were not required to show any additional "real-world harms" in order to have standing. ![]() The class claims were headed for trial in the wake of significant rulings by the District Court that were upheld on appeal by the Ninth Circuit. The $5 billion FTC settlement followed the agency's complaint that Facebook violated broad privacy provisions from a 2012 consent decree, including by misrepresenting the extent to which users could control the privacy of their facial-recognition template by implying that users would have to opt-in for the site to use facial recognition, whereas approximately 60 million users were automatically enrolled unless they opted-out. Judge Donato was outspoken in his criticism of the initial deal based on his impression that the plaintiffs' claim that Facebook was reckless in breaching the notice and consent provisions of BIPA, yielding enhanced damages, was potentially viable based on the terms of a settlement Facebook entered into with the Federal Trade Commission in 2019. District Judge James Donato of ND California. The class of Illinois residents was estimated to consist of approximately 6 million members, for whom Facebook's algorithm stored a digital face template based on their facial geometry, making the total potential value of the class claims estimated at between $10 billion and $47 billion.įacebook agreed to pay $650 million to end the BIPA class action, which was up from an initial $550 million settlement deal struck in January 2020 that failed to meet the approval of U.S. BIPA provides a private right of action to Illinois residents "aggrieved" by private entities that collect their biometric data (including retina scans, fingerprints, and face geometry) without complying with the statute's notice and consent requirements.īIPA allows per-violation statutory damages of $1,000 for negligent and $5,000 for reckless or intentional violations of the law. The company described the change as part of a company-wide move to limit the use of facial recognition in its products due to growing societal concerns and the unclear regulatory landscape surrounding use of the technology.įacebook's decision comes after it settled a major class action in February 2021 that alleged the company's facial recognition system violates Illinois's Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA"). DecemFacebook recently announced it is shutting down the facial recognition system used to identify individuals in videos and photographs based on stored face templates on the social network.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |